From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:31:46 -0800 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] resume/suspend periodic timing issue From: Steven Seeger Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44046C40.9020400@domain.hid> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: "xenomai@xenomai.org" , Jan Kiszka Right, so if a thread is suspended voluntarily it should just ignore the clock tick. I think I will read more about RTOSs and see if I change my mind, but for now I think that this is a poor design on our part. However, xenomai is what I fought hard to use for these projects, so I guess I'll have to stick with it. :) Steven On 2/28/06 7:29 AM, "Philippe Gerum" wrote: > Because set_periodic/wait_period are about defining a series of absolute dates > forming a continuous timeline, the fact that a thread goes suspending instead > of > waiting for the next work cycle does not change the fact that the clock is > still > ticking.