All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: NFS: set_bit on an 'int' variable OK for 64-bit?
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 17:51:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C12569B2.005C9182.00@d12mta01.de.ibm.com> (raw)



Hello,

since test11, the NFS code uses the set_bit and related routines
to manipulate the wb_flags member of the nfs_page struct (nfs_page.h).
Unfortunately, wb_flags has still data type 'int'.

This is a problem (at least) on the 64-bit S/390 architecture,
as our ..._bit macros assume bit 0 is the least significant bit
of a 'long', which means due to big-endian byte order that bit 0
resides in the 7th byte of the variable.  As an int occupies only
4 bytes, however, set_bit(0, int) clobbers memory.

Now the question is, who's correct?

At all other places (I found, at least), the ..._bit macros
are indeed used only on 'long' variables (or arrays).

However, on the Alpha, the ..._bit routines assume bit 0 to
be the least significant bit of an 'int'. Sparc64 on the other
hand also uses 'long'  :-/

What do you suggest we should do?   Fix nfs_page to use a 'long'
variable, or change our bitops macros to use ints?


Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards

Ulrich Weigand

--
  Dr. Ulrich Weigand
  Linux for S/390 Design & Development
  IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH, Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen
  Phone: +49-7031/16-3727   ---   Email: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-12-11 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-11 16:51 Ulrich.Weigand [this message]
2000-12-11 17:01 ` NFS: set_bit on an 'int' variable OK for 64-bit? Jes Sorensen
2000-12-11 17:08 ` Alan Cox
2000-12-15  5:47   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C12569B2.005C9182.00@d12mta01.de.ibm.com \
    --to=ulrich.weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.