From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
To: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: PCI pass through vs. slot
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 08:39:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C19C3238.56DC%keir@xensource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10612051040y2b80134cj4813f68b848c73d4@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/12/06 6:41 pm, "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am a bit confused on the PCI stuff.
>
> PASSTHRU-- does this mean that pcifront is not needed? Or only that
> the PCI is not limited as it is with slot.
No, it means that the device address (bus,slot,fn) is 'passed through'
unmodified to pcifront, with no remapping. You still need pcifront!
-- Keir
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-06 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-05 18:41 PCI pass through vs. slot ron minnich
2006-12-06 8:39 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C19C3238.56DC%keir@xensource.com \
--to=keir@xensource.com \
--cc=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.