From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Question about evtchn_callback reentry Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:31:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <51CFAB8CB6883745AE7B93B3E084EBE207DDA8@pdsmsx412.ccr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51CFAB8CB6883745AE7B93B3E084EBE207DDA8@pdsmsx412.ccr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Xu, Anthony" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-ia64-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/12/06 5:28 am, "Xu, Anthony" wrote: > If there is no special handling, low privileged interrupt may > "interrupt" high privileged interrupt. There's no concept of privilege among event channels. Since Xen simply allocates ExtInts to vectors in a round-robin manner, there is no meaningful priority comparsion to be made between vectors anyway. > BTW, > I do see evtchn_callback reentry happen on IPF dom0, and that incur > about 5% performance degradation > with KB on VTI-domain compared to non_reentry. KB == Keyboard?! Reentry is allowed -- it shouldn't happen often unless the ISRs are really long (bad) or we are hammering the interrupt line for some reason (bad). -- Keir