From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 5] Make checkpointing backwards
	compatible with older kernels
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:32:15 +0000
Message-ID: <C1CE579F.71F7%keir@xensource.com>
References: <patchbomb.1168642987@ventoux.cs.ubc.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <patchbomb.1168642987@ventoux.cs.ubc.ca>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Brendan Cully <brendan@cs.ubc.ca>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/1/07 10:03 pm, "Brendan Cully" <brendan@cs.ubc.ca> wrote:

> This set of patches

You could have sent this one as a single patch. The previous patchset was
more useful to split up, but even there a smaller set would have done (e.g.,
merge patches which implement a hypercall, plumb it into libxc and plumb it
into python). Large patchsets make me think I have a depressing amount of
review work to do. :-)

 -- Keir