From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: 32-on-64: pvfb issue
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:48:56 +0000
Message-ID: <C1DA7F58.801A%keir@xensource.com>
References: <45B4C3C0.1030406@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <45B4C3C0.1030406@suse.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@suse.de>
Cc: Xen devel list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 22/1/07 14:01, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@suse.de> wrote:

> Here we go.  Compile-tested on 32bit, more tests coming, full rebuild
> still in progress ...

Yeah, I like these. They can go in as soon as you're happy with them. One
exception is blkback -- I'm not keen on the v1/v2 thing as it is. I think we
should continue to include public/io/blkif.h and use the struct definition
there when protocol==XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_NATIVE. The exceptions can be
XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_32 and XEN_IO_PROTO_ABI_X86_64 which can use the v1/v2
definitions (but I suggest renamed to include x86_32/x86_64 in the names).
We can generalise the names if they turn out to be useful in future for
other architectures (or provide typedef/#define equivalents). So for now we
end up with three useful enumerations for blk protocols: native, x86_32,
x86_64.

 -- Keir