From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: xendomains init script
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:51:39 +0000
Message-ID: <C20B477B.A54F%keir@xensource.com>
References: <20070228062023.D27835@web.ray.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070228062023.D27835@web.ray.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Florian Kirstein <xenlist@custom.ray.net>, Xen development list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 28/2/07 05:20, "Florian Kirstein" <xenlist@custom.ray.net> wrote:

> ... I've finally build this as patch for current xen-unstable.hg.
> RedHat followed the suggestion to reimplement LSB compatibility in
> RHEL5, but for all the others (including FC6) this patch still is
> needed. It's also referenced as solution in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171056
> and I'm using it since I first posted it on all my xen builds, don't
> see problems there, should not harm non-redhat dists.

Why is the LSB case moved to after the RedHat case? LSB looks like a more
specific check (it looks for a file with 'lsb' in the path for a start!) so
wouldn't it be better to leave it where it is? Or does that not work?

 -- Keir