From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dump-core: store .xen_p2m or .xen_pfn
	section in pfn ascending order.
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:35:54 +0000
Message-ID: <C216F71A.B20E%keir@xensource.com>
References: <20070309113129.GK999%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070309113129.GK999%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, anderson@redhat.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 9/3/07 11:31, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@valinux.co.jp> wrote:

>> But shouldn't it be
>> easy to generate the memory-area list in order in the first place?
> 
> Dave, do you have any opinion?

I'm just thinking, it looks like a static list to me. Maybe you don't want
to make assumptions based on the #define'd constants though? Either way, I
think requiring xc_core_arch_memory_map_get() to return the required
ordering makes sense.

 -- Keir