From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ACM] Comilation fix for 32 bit
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:50:49 +0100
Message-ID: <C2560A59.65BF%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
References: <1177558598.4833.1.camel@941e-2.watson.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1177558598.4833.1.camel@941e-2.watson.ibm.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com>, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 26/4/07 04:36, "Stefan Berger" <stefanb@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> This fixes a compilation problem on 32 bit machines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger

What's the issue?

You're better off keeping the GUEST_HANDLE_64() and getting rid of the
compat acm stuff. As far as I can see, all your interfaces are *currently*
32/64-bit invariant. So the compat stuff can safely be removed and then you
don't need to continually keep it sync.

 -- Keir