From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: 3.0.5 rc3 paravirt save failures ? Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 14:01:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Steven Hand , "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 1/5/07 13:47, "Steven Hand" wrote: > Looks like you're running off the top of the p2m ; your domain has 800Mb > 'maxmem' and hence should have a p2m covering 800 + 8 (slack) = 808Mb. > However entry 206868 is for the physical page just beyond that. > > Can you check the value you're getting for p2m_size in xc_domain_save.c, > e.g. apply the following? And is your Xen precisely matched against libxc? I fixed XENMEM_maximum_gpfn to really return the last gpfn known to the guest, rather than the last plus one. Hence we now add one to that value to get p2m_size in xc_domain_save(). But if this fixed xc_domain_save() was run against older Xen, you would have p2m_size too big by one. -- Keir