From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: NMI deferral on i386
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:17:19 +0100
Message-ID: <C277687F.F456%keir@xensource.com>
References: <4651C258.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4651C258.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 21/5/07 15:01, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:

> I think I found a pretty reasonable solution, which I'm attaching in its
> current
> (3.1-based) form, together with the prior (untested) variant that copied the
> NMI behavior. Even if it doesn't apply to -unstable, I'd be glad if you could
> have a brief look to see whether you consider the approach too intrusive (in
> which case there would be no point in trying to bring it forward to
> -unstable).

You'll have to explain how the changes to the x86_32 entry.S work. The rest
of the patch looks good.

 -- Keir