From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [1/3] [XEN] gnttab: Add new op unmap_and_replace Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:15:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20070604123934.GA404@gondor.apana.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070604123934.GA404@gondor.apana.org.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Herbert Xu Cc: Xen Development Mailing List , "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 4/6/07 13:39, "Herbert Xu" wrote: > That's weird. > > There is only one call to 'brctl addbr' and that's via network-bridge. > So if xend's only been started once then I can't see how you could end > up with two bridges. > > Can you add a set -x to xen-network-common.sh to see who's creating > two bridges? It's also invoked by create_bridge() inside xend. So I had to blow away /var/lib/xend/state and that's fixed the problem. Anyway, all seems better now except for some hotplug slowness on my test machine for the first VM I create after rebooting the host (possibly a stale lock file that I'm having to wait to time out). However, there *are* still a lot of references to xenbr0 in the tools/ directory, including in our example configs. Should we get rid of these references, or change to 'bridge=eth0'? -- Keir