From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH 3/12] Provide basic Xen PM infrastructure
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 11:29:48 +0100
Message-ID: <C28AF9AC.100EC%keir@xensource.com>
References: <D470B4E54465E3469E2ABBC5AFAC390F013B1EF0@pdsmsx412.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <D470B4E54465E3469E2ABBC5AFAC390F013B1EF0@pdsmsx412.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Cc: "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@intel.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 5/6/07 11:22, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:

> How is the relocation address decided for x86-64 Xen? Since trampoline
> code still uses 0x90000 as the case before relocation change, I guess
> wakeup code can still work since it's hard coded to 0x7000 by far. As
> long as 0-1M is still special owned by dom_io (not participate into heap
> allocation), I guess that wakeup code should still work.

Ah, okay. Fair enough. Also I was indeed looking at the wrong patchset. I'll
pull down the May patches and complain about those instead. :-)

Yes, for small issues I'll either fix them myself or apply and let you fix
with follow-up patches.

 -- Keir