From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Bligh Subject: Re: Early ACPI events prevent subsequent ACPI functionality on xen 4.3 + HVM domU Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:08:34 +0100 Message-ID: References: <752956577.8634488.1368537190555.JavaMail.root@zimbra002> <1368812151.24012.66.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> <71194FD00ABB7415DD6106AA@nimrod.local> <1369146037.21246.89.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <519B85FA.6060809@eu.citrix.com> <86B77960F7BEC777A3C5C339@Ximines.local> <519B947D.8030607@eu.citrix.com> <519B9801.3080901@eu.citrix.com> <20130521164531.GE3669@phenom.dumpdata.com> <6D7B8289F0F8A65C8C2A25C7@Ximines.local> Reply-To: Alex Bligh Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Paul Durrant , Stefano Stabellini , Alex Bligh , Anthony Perard , Diana Crisan , Dave Scott List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --On 22 May 2013 10:21:44 +0100 George Dunlap wrote: >> The second problem is that ACPI shutdown appears not to work reliably >> either (whenever issued). > > I'll have another look today, but it seemed fairly reliable to me. > Just to double-check -- you are issuing the ACPI commands after the VM > has come all the way up, right? Or are you issuing them early during > boot, like you were for the xl shutdown commands? I believe Diana has tried both. Diana? > The other thing is that I'm using Wheezy, not Ubuntu, which may cause > a difference. Possibly. I guess Diana could try that too :-) -- Alex Bligh