From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Buffered IO for IO? Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:31:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Zulauf, John" , Mats Petersson , Trolle Selander Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/7/07 20:38, "Zulauf, John" wrote: > I'm running on an 8-core system with currently only two HVM domains > (with currently single VCPU each). Both top on Dom0 and xm top, don't > seem to indicate qemu-dm as the performance bottleneck. However, I'm > not sure about roundtrip latency through the xenstore to qemu and back. Well, maybe you are just seeing VMEXIT time then. You might try adding some RDTSC from when a notification is sent to qemu until when your HVM vcpu is rewoken, and see what the latency looks like. It shouldn't be all that bad if dom0 is on another cpu and is otherwise fairly idle. Also, you could see how many characters are sent and received to start a windbg session. If there are a surprisingly large number of bytes received then it may be the receive direction is causing more trouble than the transmit direction. -- Keir