From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: XENPF_ numbering?
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:53:17 +0100
Message-ID: <C2CFB75D.13261%keir@xensource.com>
References: <20070727131734.GA9121@totally.trollied.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070727131734.GA9121@totally.trollied.org.uk>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

The old dom0_op() API maps onto the platform_op, so any platform_ops that
were previously dom0_ops had to keep their old dom0_op-era numbers.

 -- Keir

On 27/7/07 14:17, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:

> 
> I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_*
> numbering?
> 
> thanks
> john
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel