From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 64-bit foreign header check
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:59:49 +0100
Message-ID: <C2E8D375.143E1%keir@xensource.com>
References: <20070815143716.GA8459@barman.uk.sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20070815143716.GA8459@barman.uk.sun.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 15/8/07 15:37, "John Levon" <john.levon@sun.com> wrote:

>> Won't gcc produce 64-bit binaries by default in a 64-bit environment?
> 
> There is no such thing as a "64-bit environment" on Solaris, all machines ship
> with both 32 and 64 bit functionality (of course the kernel must be 64-bit to
> actually /use/ such).
> 
> Thus we build twice, once in 32-bit, once in 64-bit.

Then isn't your TARGET_ARCH!=COMPILE_ARCH for one of these builds? Sounds
like you have a 32-bit-ish compile environment (since you produce 32-bit
binaries by default), and hence it would be correct to have
COMPILE_ARCH==x86_32 for both builds.

 -- Keir