Re: [PATCH] xen-unstable: 3.0-unstable or 3.1-unstable?

[Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>]

Yes, 3.0-unstable makes no sense. It should probably be 3.2-unstable, as
these are unstable bits that will be part of the stable 3.2 release. 3.1 is
already out the door.

 -- Keir

On 17/8/07 13:55, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> wrote:

> 
> When I build xen-unstable, I see this line:
> 
> tools/figlet/figlet -d tools/figlet Xen 3.0-unstable >>
> include/xen/compile.h.new
> 
> Is xen-unstable  3.0-unstable or is this 3.1-unstable?
> 
> In the latter case, the patch below should be applied.
> 
> 
> diff -r 256160ff19b7 xen/Makefile
> --- a/xen/Makefile      Thu Aug 16 13:27:59 2007 +0100
> +++ b/xen/Makefile      Fri Aug 17 14:51:33 2007 +0200
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>  # This is the correct place to edit the build version.
>  # All other places this is stored (eg. compile.h) should be autogenerated.
>  export XEN_VERSION       = 3
> -export XEN_SUBVERSION    = 0
> +export XEN_SUBVERSION    = 1
>  export XEN_EXTRAVERSION ?= -unstable$(XEN_VENDORVERSION)
>  export XEN_FULLVERSION   = $(XEN_VERSION).
> $(XEN_SUBVERSION)$(XEN_EXTRAVERSION)
>  -include xen-version
>