From: Peter Braam <Peter.Braam@Sun.COM>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [Lustre-devel] Andrew's I/O graphs
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:20:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C3ECC828.A1C%peter.braam@sun.com> (raw)
I see some worrying dips in the graphs - can our I/O specialists comment on
which ones are understood and which are not?
- peter -
On 2/25/08 2:44 PM, "Andrew C. Uselton" <acuselton@lbl.gov> wrote:
> Howdy all,
> I'd been in conversation with Cliff White over the last few weeks, and
> he'd expressed an interest in having me post a draft of a report I've
> been working on. If you've already heard of it here it is. For those
> who hadn't I'll try to describe it briefly.
>
> In December I assisted with some Lustre benchmark tests on the
> Franklin Cray XT here at NERSC. Since then I've tried to summarize our
> analysis and results. The attached pdf is a draft of that summary. The
> introduction is almost completely useless, so feel free to skip (unless
> you want to have a laugh at the author's expense). Section 3 has the
> main details about what we observed and what we thought about it.
> Section 2 may be amusing for those (like me) who care about methodology.
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
------ End of Forwarded Message
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20080228/97465ec9/attachment.htm>
next prev reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 3:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-25 21:44 [Lustre-devel] Thoughts on benchmarking Andrew C. Uselton
2008-02-28 16:51 ` Peter Braam
2008-02-29 3:20 ` Peter Braam [this message]
2008-02-29 21:10 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-02-29 21:38 ` Andrew C. Uselton
2008-02-29 22:56 ` Stephen Sugiyama
2008-03-04 14:46 ` Nicholas Henke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C3ECC828.A1C%peter.braam@sun.com \
--to=peter.braam@sun.com \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.