From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent changing a memory size ofDomain-0 evenif users make a careless mistake Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:51:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47F62426.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <47F62426.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich Cc: Ky Srinivasan , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Masaki Kanno , Kurt Garloff List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 4/4/08 11:50, "Jan Beulich" wrote: >>>> Keir Fraser 04.04.08 12:27 >>> >> This at least I have a bit more time for. It's trying to pick a minimum >> below which only bad things can happen. This is a plausible thing to try for >> when you know the details of the specific operating system (which of course >> you do in this case, since it's implemented in an OS driver). What I don't >> like about Masaki's patch is that it's very specific, it abuses a >> configuration variable that actually has its own meaning specific to the >> auto-ballooning logic, and also is frankly an unwarranted and possibly >> unwanted expression of policy inside xend. > > So any chance you'd take it if either of the original authors or I submit > it with a formal Signed-Off-By line? Yes. -- Keir