From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: adjust placement of pause insn in _raw_spin_lock() Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:02:55 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ah, I suppose it reduce lock acquisition latency slightly. I'll apply it. -- Keir On 8/8/08 14:12, "Keir Fraser" wrote: > Why? > > -- Keir > > On 8/8/08 13:49, "Jan Beulich" wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >> >> Index: 2008-08-06/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h >> =================================================================== >> --- 2008-08-06.orig/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2007-09-10 >> 09:59:37.000000000 +0200 >> +++ 2008-08-06/xen/include/asm-x86/spinlock.h 2008-08-07 12:36:13.000000000 >> +0200 >> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ static inline void _raw_spin_lock(spinlo >> "1: lock; decb %0 \n" >> " js 2f \n" >> ".section .text.lock,\"ax\"\n" >> - "2: cmpb $0,%0 \n" >> - " rep; nop \n" >> + "2: rep; nop \n" >> + " cmpb $0,%0 \n" >> " jle 2b \n" >> " jmp 1b \n" >> ".previous" >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel