From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH] rendezvous-based local time calibration WOW! Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:38:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080811143713.GA17732@totally.trollied.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080811143713.GA17732@totally.trollied.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: John Levon , Dan Magenheimer Cc: Ian Pratt , Nils Nieuwejaar , Dave Winchell , "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 11/8/08 15:37, "John Levon" wrote: > It's only non-zero if we can indeed reschedule fast enough. If it's now > below the threshold, then we can consider it effectively fixed. Only > testing can really tell us that. Depending on how critical this guarantee is, I wouldn't rely on Xen to perform perfectly. Probably you should keep your lock. -- Keir