From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: XEN Hypervisor Lines Of Code
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:07:47 +0100
Message-ID: <C4EEBA93.26F69%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20080911104847.47270@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080911104847.47270@gmx.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Lil Evil <Lil_Evil@gmx.de>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 11/9/08 11:48, "Lil Evil" <Lil_Evil@gmx.de> wrote:

>> So that's a more reasonable estimate in my opinion, at about half Joanna's
>> figure. Obviously this is still rather larger than historical figures for
>> Xen version 1 or Xen version 2.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> Hi
> 
> After looking at the tree, I would say that this sounds more likely.
> Maybe, http://www.xen.org/xen/ deserves an updated concerning this - or the
> number should be removed at all to prevent confusion.

Mmm, yes that figure is rather old!

 -- Keir