From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Xend] Move some backend configuration Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:09:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080930153054.GE15442@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080930153054.GE15442@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: Pascal Bouchareine , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, John Levon List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30/9/08 16:30, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > Console data > > /local/domain/%d/console/vnc-port > /local/domain/%d/console/tty Duplicating this pair of nodes sounds fine to me, *but* then libvirt is simply remaining vulnerable to the kind of attack we're are looking to avoid? Can any good really come from keeping the old locations? -- Keir