From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [RFC] Replacing Xen's xmalloc engine and(?) API Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:34:07 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dan Magenheimer , Nitin Gupta Cc: Diwaker Gupta , kurt.hackel@oracle.com, "Xen-Devel (E-mail)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/10/08 19:03, "Dan Magenheimer" wrote: > Excellent! Your xvMalloc looks even better! I'll read the > code and try it (tomorrow). > > Keir, is a "GNU Lesser GPL Version 3" license OK for Xen? Unfortunately I doubt it, since Xen is GPLv2 and we wouldn't really be linking against xvMalloc as a separate library (not least because it would probably get tailored a bit to get checked into the Xen tree) so the 'Lesser' license probably doesn't apply. If Nitin isn't too attached to GPLv3 it would certainly be better for us if it used GPLv2, like TLSF. -- Keir