From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: irq_guest_eoi_timer interaction with MSI
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:38:49 +0000
Message-ID: <C5517829.1F913%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <492BCAE6.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <492BCAE6.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 25/11/08 08:52, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:

>>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> 25.11.08 09:44 >>>
>> ... And lack of 64-bit capability is the only reason not to run 64-bit Xen
>> these days.
> 
> Is it, really? That is, are all the save/restore/migrate issues indeed fixed?
> I
> didn't think so, but then again I don't follow closely what happens on the
> tools side...

That's a dom0 vs domU issue. You can run 32-bit dom0 on 64-bit Xen, and that
suffices to avoid Xen's address-space constraints.

 -- Keir