From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
"Xen-Devel (E-mail)" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: New heap API and scrubbing
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:19:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C5B6BECF.1784%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4d380ca-b23a-4a6b-adb9-19e9016569eb@default>
They allocate from the same pool of pages, but they differ very slightly. If
you alloc_fooheap_pages() you must free_fooheap_pages(). You could probably
make the distinction based on is_xenheap_page() if you wanted.
-- Keir
On 10/02/2009 00:24, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:
> So in the new (soon-to-be 3.4) heap API, are
>
> alloc_domheap_pages(NULL,order,flags)
>
> and
>
> alloc_xenheap_pages(order,flags)
>
> synonomous on 64-bit hypervisors? I.e. they
> are allocating from the same pool of pages?
> And if so are the matching free routines
> synonomous?
>
> If not, under what circumstances should one be
> used rather than the other?
>
> Are there any cases now where free_XXXheap_pages
> might free up pages that could be grabbed by
> another domain and those pages have not been
> scrubbed?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 0:24 New heap API and scrubbing Dan Magenheimer
2009-02-10 5:19 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2009-02-10 8:22 ` Jan Beulich
2009-02-10 8:44 ` Keir Fraser
2009-02-10 22:53 ` Dan Magenheimer
2009-02-11 7:58 ` Keir Fraser
2009-02-11 14:20 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C5B6BECF.1784%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.