From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] MSI-INTx interrupt translation for HVM
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:55:21 +0000
Message-ID: <C5D05259.3AB4%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20090227113753.6A27.CB716985@necst.nec.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090227113753.6A27.CB716985@necst.nec.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Shohei Fujiwara <fujiwara-sxa@necst.nec.co.jp>, Qing He <qing.he@intel.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 27/02/2009 02:41, "Shohei Fujiwara" <fujiwara-sxa@necst.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> I found hypervisor doesn't issue EOI before injecting the
> interrupt to guest domain, if MSI isn't maskable.
> The 2nd interrupt may be lost. What do you think about this?

The second interrupt should not be lost! It should be marked in the local
APIC's IRR bitmap and should hence cause an interrupt to fire as soon as the
in-service interrupt is EOIed (and hence cleared from the local APIC's ISR
bitmap).

Are you thus *sure* this is really the root-cause of your problem?

Could it be that the MSI *is* maskable, and that masking/unmasking loses
interrupt messages, for example?

 -- Keir