From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Red Hat dropped XEN Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:07:15 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jayaraman, Bhaskar" , Venefax , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Yes to VT-x, no to VT-d. -- Keir On 09/03/2009 07:41, "Jayaraman, Bhaskar" wrote: > This means they don't spport VT-x and VT-d which are features that are > available from later versions only? > Bhaskar. > > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Venefax > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 6:16 AM > To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > Subject: [Xen-devel] Red Hat dropped XEN > > I was really dismayed today when I installed the latest Red Hat 5.3 and the > version of Xen included is 3.1. Apparently, the only distribution with Xen > 3.3 is Suse. Am I reading here that Red Hat will never upgrade Xen to newer > versions? I installed the released version, and it still uses Xen 3.1. > Federico > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel