From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: Some question to changeset 17962 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:52:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Jiang, Yunhong" , Brendan Cully Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Okay, I misread your original email. Tools it is then! -- Keir On 10/03/2009 08:29, "Jiang, Yunhong" wrote: > Sure, I will not do serialization in hypervisor. > I have try the implemetnation in libxc side, not xend. > > -- Yunhong Jiang > > Keir Fraser wrote: >> On 10/03/2009 01:47, "Jiang, Yunhong" wrote: >> >>>> Agreed :) >>> >>> Brendan/Keir, thanks for your clarification. I asked this because according >>> discussion with Tim, we will utilize this feature for page offline also, >>> that means multiple process will utilize this feature. >>> I will create something in tools to achieve this. >> >> Well hang on. Only one process can likely safely suspend and >> work on a guest >> at a time. Unless you do some serialisation in the toolstack (probably xend) >> then you're going to be racey aren't you? I don't think you need to >> serialise in the hypervisor. >> >> -- Keir