From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip vcpu_hotplug for VCPU 0 in smp_resume
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:31:46 +0100
Message-ID: <C5F90122.5516%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <1238581584.4440.18.camel@moonstone.uk.level5networks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1238581584.4440.18.camel@moonstone.uk.level5networks.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Kieran Mansley <kmansley@solarflare.com>, Brendan Cully <brendan@cs.ubc.ca>
Cc: "andy@cs.ubc.ca" <andy@cs.ubc.ca>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 01/04/2009 11:26, "Kieran Mansley" <kmansley@solarflare.com> wrote:

>> Could it be as simple as this? I can't remember what happens if
>> unregister_xenbus_watch is called after the xenbus connection has been
>> reset. Should we just free the guest structures without interacting
>> with xenstore at the start of the resume method?
> 
> It may be possible to synchronise the watch handler with the
> suspend/resume/cancel cycle without removing the watch, but that starts
> to get complicated.

Could we avoid any of this logic executing if there are no net accelerators?

 -- Keir