From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: AW: Re: Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:49:19 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Carsten Schiers , kraxel Cc: yamahata , jeremy , xen-devel , "chris.ace" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 05/06/2009 18:58, "Carsten Schiers" wrote: > What I'd like to add is that I would prefer a better tagging of the > kernel > repo to identify subversion of the kernel that belong to a certain > version > of Xen, whatever kernel that might be. Fixes and improvements are > happening > so quickly that on the pure user's side the combination can make a > difference, > no matter how much effort you put in to keep it independent. As I've said so many times, the kernel version and Xen version are *not* tied. We don't do kernel releases tied to Xen versions, at all. -- Keir