From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu_user_regs * to
	__smp_call_function_interrupt
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:28:34 +0100
Message-ID: <C660FCB2.DB86%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <4A3AEA35.8000206@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A3AEA35.8000206@oracle.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "mukesh.rathor@oracle.com" <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 19/06/2009 02:30, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@oracle.com> wrote:

>> Passing a new paramter to a function which then ignores it is pointless.
>> I'll consider this as part of a patch that actually does something with it.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
> 
> It does, but in ext/debuggers.hg tree. Fine, I'll just nag you more now
> to pull in the debuggers in mainline :).

It's like a 10-line patch. Just carry it!

 -- Keir