From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86,
 hvm: Allow delivery of timer interrupts to VCPUs != 0.
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:41:46 +0100
Message-ID: <C67366BA.EBE4%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <7k4otuo0g8.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <7k4otuo0g8.fsf@pingu.sky.yk.fujitsu.co.jp>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Kouya Shimura <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

This doesn't look too bad, given the current vpt interface we have. My main
comment is regarding vpit_vcpu(), vrtc_vcpu() and vhpet.vcpu. Seems all of
these could unconditionally use i8259_target. I suggest also introducing
vhpet_vcpu(), and then pointing all three *_vcpu() macros at
pt_i8259_target() only. And get rid of the vhpet.vcpu field.

Would that work okay?

 -- Keir

On 03/07/2009 05:27, "Kouya Shimura" <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> This patch is needed for kexec/kdump since kdump may halt VCPU#0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kouya Shimura <kouya@jp.fujitsu.com>
>