From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: vmx problem Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:28:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20091022142221.GP1434@reaktio.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091022142221.GP1434@reaktio.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Pasi =?ISO-8859-1?B?S+Rya2vkaW5lbg==?= Cc: "Fajar A." , Fasiha Ashraf , xen List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 22/10/2009 15:22, "Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen" wrote: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:12:04PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: >> VMX is hidden from guest kernels as it's not a feature they themselves c= an >> make use of. Hence it does not appear in the guest's /proc/cpuinfo. >=20 > Any plans for 'nested' VMX support? KVM seems to have that.. Nice to have but arguable usefulness I'd say. I don't think anyone is working on it. -- Keir