From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH2] multiboot module support
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:18:16 +0000
Message-ID: <C74DBBA8.47B8%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
References: <20091215204236.GI4962@const.famille.thibault.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091215204236.GI4962@const.famille.thibault.fr>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Your original patch is checked in already, you know?

 -- Keir

On 15/12/2009 20:42, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote:

> So, what's the preferred way?
> 
> - either completely multiboot compliant, has to patch libxc and modify
>   start_info to add the number of modules (my second patch)
> - multiboot compliant except the module table has to end with a NULL
>   entry to let the domU compute the number of modules, has to patch
>   libxc but leave start_info as is (my third patch).
> - multiboot-like, offsets have to be recomputed by the domU, no need to
>   patch libxc for now, until somebody wants to add xend support (my
>   first patch).
> 
> Samuel