All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
To: Alex Williams <awilliams@iweb.com>
Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression: XEN 4.0.0 total_memory decrease
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:23:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C7ED181F.11751%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C7ED13EA.1174E%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>

I've fixed this regression as xen-unstable:21190 and xen-4.0-testing:21114.
The fix will appear in Xen 4.0.1.

 Thanks,
 Keir

On 15/04/2010 19:05, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> wrote:

> Ah, hm, I think this is a bug in total memory reporting only. I think the
> memory is still there in the free pools though. :-) How does xm info's
> free_memory compare in the two cases? I bet it's a lot closer than 150MB
> (assuming dom0 is allocated the same amount of memory in both cases, e.g.,
> by explicitly specifying dom0_mem=xxx on Xen command line).
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 15/04/2010 18:33, "Alex Williams" <awilliams@iweb.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Both builds run a 64-bit Xen kernel and 64-bit Dom0 kernel.
>> 
>> (XEN)  Xen  kernel: 64-bit, lsb, compat32
>> (XEN)  Dom0 kernel: 64-bit, lsb, paddr 0xffffffff80200000 ->
>> 0xffffffff805d388c
>> 
>> As for the RAM:
>> 
>> Xen 3.4.2: (XEN) System RAM: 3946MB (4041012kB)
>> Xen 4.0.0: (XEN) System RAM: 4084MB (4182064kB)
>> 
>> I have also verified with only 2048MB installed in the system. Here are
>> the results:
>> 
>> Xen 3.4.2: (XEN) System RAM: 2036MB (2084912kB)
>> Xen 4.0.0: (XEN) System RAM: 1898MB (1943860kB)
>> 
>> Still 150MB RAM missing... it appears this problem is static and
>> independant of the amount of RAM installed in the system.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> Are the hypervisor and dom0 kernel 64-bit or 32-bit? Xen prints a message
>>> "System RAM: xxx" early during boot. Do these differ significantly for you
>>> between 3.4.2 and 4.0.0?
>>> 
>>>  K.
>>> 
>>> On 15/04/2010 16:54, "Alex Williams" <awilliams@iweb.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> I noticed a significant *decrease* (150MB) in "total_memory" on a host
>>>> build using XEN 4.0.0 with kernel 2.6.18.
>>>> 
>>>> Here are the details:
>>>> 
>>>> Server = 4096MB RAM
>>>> XEN 3.4.2 + kernel 2.6.18: xm info | grep total_memory = 4084
>>>> XEN 4.0.0 + kernel 2.6.18: xm info | grep total_memory = 3946
>>>> 
>>>> The exact same kernel config file was used for both builds. I also made
>>>> sure there is absolutely no difference on the hosts (while the builds
>>>> are created on a different machine).
>>>> 
>>>> This seems like a regression, unless someone can provide suggestions on
>>>> how to correct this?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-15 15:54 Possible regression: XEN 4.0.0 total_memory decrease Alex Williams
2010-04-15 16:33 ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-15 17:33   ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 17:42     ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 18:05     ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-15 18:23       ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2010-04-16  7:53         ` Jan Beulich
2010-04-16 17:37           ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-19  7:35             ` Jan Beulich
2010-04-19  7:51               ` Keir Fraser
2010-04-15 18:26       ` Alex Williams
2010-04-15 18:34         ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C7ED181F.11751%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=awilliams@iweb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.