From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: Configuration of nestedhvm
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:15:34 +0100
Message-ID: <C8D491B6.256EE%keir@xen.org>
References: <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B22DBEA5AA@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B22DBEA5AA@shsmsx501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 08/10/2010 08:56, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@intel.com> wrote:

>> I think patch#2 probably makes sense, but it should wait for the
>> patch that actually implements the per-domain config option, and
>> properly implements is_nestedhvm(), before going in.
> 
> Yes, I am waiting for the take of that patch from Chris as well, but for some
> reason it is not in yet :(
> 
> Either patch is taken first is fine. I can do the simple rebase.

The patch isn't in my queue. I assume it is largely tools-side and waiting
for a tools maintainer to do something with it, and/or Tim to Ack it.

 -- Keir