From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC 0/5] various small improvements and
	cleanup
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:44:16 +0000
Message-ID: <C937BF40.E6FF%keir@xen.org>
References: <4D120FDC0200007800029550@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D120FDC0200007800029550@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 22/12/2010 13:49, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com> wrote:

>> Ah yes. Put that bit in a separate patch.
> 
> Using the general purpose sort is a requirement for the change
> to PC-relative exception table entries. Or do you mean you want
> the macro-ization split from the actual layout change?

I thought switching sort method was a logically separate change and could go
in a separate patch. If not it doesn't matter that much.

 -- Keir