From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: dump runq with debug key 'r' may cause dead loop
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:05:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C99669FD.14216%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F26D193E20BBDC42A43B611D1BDEDE7125E7A28293@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 04/03/2011 09:40, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@intel.com> wrote:
> Recently I found dump runq with debug key 'r' may cause dead loop like below:
>
> (XEN) active vcpus:
> (XEN) 1: [1.0] pri=0 flags=0 cpu=0 credit=263 [w=256]
> (XEN) 2: [0.2] pri=0 flags=0 cpu=5 credit=284 [w=256]
> (XEN) 3: [0.2] pri=0 flags=0 cpu=5 credit=282 [w=256]
> ...
> (XEN) xxxxx: [0.2] pri=0 flags=0 cpu=2 credit=54 [w=256]
> ...
> (XEN) xxxxx: [0.2] pri=0 flags=0 cpu=3 credit=-48 [w=256]
> ...
>
> This means the active vcpu 0.2 became non-active just after it was access in
> the loop '2:', and that list element became empty state (head->next==next).
>
> Should we always hold a lock before access any schedule related list, even in
> the debug purpose dump code? If it is not acceptable, then we'd better add a
> list_empty() check in the dump functions which access schedule related list at
> least to avoid such a dead loop.
The appropriate lock should be taken. Please send a patch.
-- Keir
> Jimmy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-04 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 9:40 dump runq with debug key 'r' may cause dead loop Wei, Gang
2011-03-04 10:05 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2011-03-04 14:51 ` [PATCH]sched_credit: Hold lock while dump scheduler info (RE: dump runq with debug key 'r' may cause dead loop) Wei, Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C99669FD.14216%keir.xen@gmail.com \
--to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=gang.wei@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.