From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: difference between xen hypervisor and common kernel on handling BIOS's e820 map ? Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 08:54:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1314776697.78208.YahooMailNeo@web122109.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1314776697.78208.YahooMailNeo@web122109.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Lin-bao Zhang , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 31/08/2011 08:44, "Lin-bao Zhang" wrote: > now xen-hypervisor has been executed ,we can destroy any parts of grub an= d > BIOS.=A0 > so I think ,xen-hypervisor can=A0arbitrarily any parts below 0x10000 (64K).= =A0 We keep our lives simple and do not dynamically allocate any memory below 1MB. -- Keir