From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] IRQ Cleanup: rename nr_ioapic_registers to nr_ioapic_entries Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:25:22 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4E80B8F90200007800057DCE@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E80B8F90200007800057DCE@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jan Beulich , Andrew Cooper Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/09/2011 08:40, "Jan Beulich" wrote: >> I guess it depends on whether you consider that we should stay in line >> with Linux or not. While the code did start in Linux, it has diverged >> so far that it really is its own file now. >> >> Either we should un-diverge from Linux (unlikely to happen), or consider >> it properly forked and not worry; staying in this intermediate state is >> not sustainable and leads to keeping misleading bits about while an >> overhaul is needed. > > There's one more alternative: You could propose the same renaming > on Linux. Not a bad idea. But I don't think it should stop us making these kinds of changes in Xen now. We stayed in sync with upstream Linux on these files for a long while, but we're well diverged now. -- Keir