From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: don't use xmalloc_array() for
	allocation of the (per-CPU) IDTs
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:15:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CABC5CBD.32774%keir@xen.org>
References: <4E96B593020000780005B0CE@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E96B593020000780005B0CE@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 13/10/2011 08:55, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

>>>> On 13.10.11 at 09:50, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> wrote:
>> Finally, I'm not sure about more x86-64 code movement: I'd like to kill
>> x86-32 entirely really.
> 
> I know, but you got pushed back each time you tried...

I think we're stuck with it for 4.2. Will try again when we open development
for 4.3. The argument last time was the low-powered Atoms, used in low-end
netbooks; but there's no evidence that anyone is using Xen on such
platforms. I can't imagine it would be very worthwhile.

 -- Keir

> Jan
>