From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keir Fraser Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler rate controller Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:57:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: George Dunlap , "Lv, Hui" Cc: "Duan, Jiangang" , "Tian, Kevin" , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Dong, Eddie" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 24/10/2011 17:17, "George Dunlap" wrote: > * I'm not sure I like the idea of doing this at the generic level than > at the specific scheduler level -- e.g., inside of credit1. For > better or for worse, all aspects of scheduling work together, and even > small changes tend to have a significant effect on the emergent > behavior. I understand why you'd want this in the generic scheduling > code; but it seems like it would be better for each scheduler to > implement a rate control independently. Yes, this doesn't belong in schedule.c. -- Keir