All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
To: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] First release candidates for Xen 4.0.4 and 4.1.3
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 08:50:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CBCE8EEB.32870%keir.xen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205072123530.19527@vega-b.dur.ac.uk>

On 07/05/2012 21:52, "M A Young" <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 May 2012, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> I have just tagged first release candidates for 4.0.4 and 4.1.3:
>> 
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.0-testing.hg (tag 4.0.4-rc1)
>> http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg (tag 4.1.3-rc1)
>> 
>> Please test!
> 
> I am seeing problems building 4.1.3-rc1 on Fedora 17, though it might be
> changes in Fedora 17 rather than xen changes that have triggered it. When
> trying to compile objects such as scheduler.c in tools/blktap2/drivers I
> get the error
> /usr/include/features.h:329:3: error: #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requested but
> disabled [-Werror=cpp]
> 
> On checking that file I see that this is because -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> is requested with -O0 . Fedora 17 decides to warn about this and it
> becomes an error as -Werror is specified.
> This conflict occurs because of the line
> CFLAGS += -Werror -g -O0
> in tools/blktap2/drivers/Makefile
> I can of course work around the problem in my build, but I was wondering
> if optimization level 0 is still necessary for this code. I think the
> only other place -O0 is used now is tools/security/Makefile which I
> assume will also trigger the problem.

Thanks. The same appears to be true in xen-unstable also. Is the solution to
simply remove -O0 from the command line? We can test that out in
xen-unstable if so, and backport if it causes no problems.

 -- Keir


> Michael Young

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-08  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-07 12:58 [ANNOUNCE] First release candidates for Xen 4.0.4 and 4.1.3 Keir Fraser
2012-05-07 17:18 ` Pavel Matěja
2012-05-07 20:03   ` Keir Fraser
2012-05-07 20:08 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-07 20:52 ` M A Young
2012-05-08  7:50   ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-05-09 19:03     ` M A Young
2012-05-09 19:10       ` Andrew Cooper
2012-05-09 20:30         ` Olaf Hering
2012-05-11 15:51 ` Olaf Hering
2012-05-14 10:09   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CBCE8EEB.32870%keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --to=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.