From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irq: Remove irqaction.free_on_release
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:44:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC99CCC8.4E6A2%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37f1afbec80b0f052aec.1349701772@andrewcoop.uk.xensource.com>
But reasoning behind c/s 20153, which introduced it, still applies? Callers
using setup_irq() don't want their passed-in irqaction to be xfree()ed?
-- Keir
On 08/10/2012 14:09, "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
> It is always set to 1, and only checked on some of the codepaths which free an
> irqaction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> --
> This patch does touch common code as well as x86 and arm architectures,
> so probably needs quite a few acks.
>
> diff -r 5fbdbf585f5f -r 37f1afbec80b xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ void __init release_irq(unsigned int irq
> /* Wait to make sure it's not being used on another CPU */
> do { smp_mb(); } while ( desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS );
>
> - if (action && action->free_on_release)
> + if ( action )
> xfree(action);
> }
>
> diff -r 5fbdbf585f5f -r 37f1afbec80b xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ int __init request_irq(unsigned int irq,
> action->handler = handler;
> action->name = devname;
> action->dev_id = dev_id;
> - action->free_on_release = 1;
>
> retval = setup_irq(irq, action);
> if (retval)
> diff -r 5fbdbf585f5f -r 37f1afbec80b xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -952,7 +952,6 @@ int __init request_irq(unsigned int irq,
> action->handler = handler;
> action->name = devname;
> action->dev_id = dev_id;
> - action->free_on_release = 1;
>
> retval = setup_irq(irq, action);
> if (retval)
> @@ -979,7 +978,7 @@ void __init release_irq(unsigned int irq
> /* Wait to make sure it's not being used on another CPU */
> do { smp_mb(); } while ( desc->status & IRQ_INPROGRESS );
>
> - if (action && action->free_on_release)
> + if ( action )
> xfree(action);
> }
>
> diff -r 5fbdbf585f5f -r 37f1afbec80b xen/include/xen/irq.h
> --- a/xen/include/xen/irq.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/irq.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ struct irqaction {
> void (*handler)(int, void *, struct cpu_user_regs *);
> const char *name;
> void *dev_id;
> - bool_t free_on_release;
> };
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-08 13:09 [PATCH] irq: Remove irqaction.free_on_release Andrew Cooper
2012-10-09 11:44 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-10-09 14:38 ` Andrew Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC99CCC8.4E6A2%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.