From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: "Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Kurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>,
George Shuklin <george.shuklin@gmail.com>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
DarioFaggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 10:57:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CCC1409D.51B70%keir@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20635.34133.118531.778138@mariner.uk.xensource.com>
On 08/11/2012 10:11, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Keir Fraser writes ("Re: Proposed new "memory capacity claim"
> hypercall/feature"):
>> On 07/11/2012 22:17, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> I think this brings us back to the proposed "claim" hypercall/subop.
>>> Unless there are further objections or suggestions for different
>>> approaches, I'll commence prototyping it, OK?
>>
>> Yes, in fact I thought you'd started already!
>
> Sorry to play bad cop here but I am still far from convinced that a
> new hypercall is necessary or desirable.
>
> A lot of words have been written but the concrete, detailed, technical
> argument remains to be made IMO.
I agree but prototyping != acceptance, and at least it gives something
concrete to hang the discussion on. Otherwise this longwinded thread is
going nowhere.
> Ian.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-29 17:06 Proposed new "memory capacity claim" hypercall/feature Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-29 18:24 ` Keir Fraser
2012-10-29 21:08 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-29 22:22 ` Keir Fraser
2012-10-29 23:03 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-29 23:17 ` Keir Fraser
2012-10-30 15:13 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-30 14:43 ` Keir Fraser
2012-10-30 16:33 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-30 9:11 ` George Dunlap
2012-10-30 16:13 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-29 22:35 ` Tim Deegan
2012-10-29 23:21 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-30 8:13 ` Tim Deegan
2012-10-30 15:26 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-30 8:29 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 15:43 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-30 16:04 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-30 17:13 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-31 8:14 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-31 16:04 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-10-31 16:19 ` Jan Beulich
2012-10-31 16:51 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-02 9:01 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-02 9:30 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-04 19:43 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-04 20:35 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-05 0:23 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-05 10:29 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-05 14:54 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-05 22:24 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-05 22:58 ` Zhigang Wang
2012-11-05 22:58 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-06 13:23 ` Ian Campbell
2012-11-05 22:33 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-06 10:49 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-05 9:16 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-07 22:17 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-08 7:36 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-08 10:11 ` Ian Jackson
2012-11-08 10:57 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2012-11-08 21:45 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-12 11:03 ` Ian Jackson
2012-11-08 8:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 8:18 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-08 8:54 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 9:12 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-08 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 10:50 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-08 13:48 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 19:16 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-08 22:32 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-09 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-08 18:38 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-05 17:14 ` George Dunlap
2012-11-05 18:21 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-01 2:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-11-01 15:51 ` Dan Magenheimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CCC1409D.51B70%keir@xen.org \
--to=keir@xen.org \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=george.shuklin@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kurt.hackel@oracle.com \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
--cc=zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.