From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: xen with huffman coding
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:27:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CCF103FE.55C40%keir@xen.org>
References: <50CB3C68.30605@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <50CB3C68.30605@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Mats Petersson <mats.petersson@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 14/12/2012 14:49, "Mats Petersson" <mats.petersson@citrix.com> wrote:

> For code and typical data, I'm not at all convinced that huffman
> encoding (which is based on run-lengths) is the best method.

Actually Huffman encoding is not a run-length scheme.

 -- Keir