From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9D4E0144A for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2013 08:20:37 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,432,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="269326474" Received: from orsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.225.133]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Jan 2013 08:20:37 -0800 Received: from orsmsx153.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.226.247) by ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.225.133) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:20:37 -0800 Received: from orsmsx105.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.201]) by ORSMSX153.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.66]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 08:20:25 -0800 From: "Stewart, David C" To: Tino Breddin , yocto Thread-Topic: [yocto] Future of WebHob? Thread-Index: AQHN7ZuLj0brzuL1I0W5QjPV2N7KI5g/nPWA Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:20:35 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50EC0433.4020206@travelping.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.254.118.218] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Future of WebHob? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:20:37 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <5198D76D96035144B78EC5F52C9521FB@intel.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/8/13 3:34 AM, "Tino Breddin" wrote: >Hi, > >I was wondering what the future plans for WebHob are. I'm aware of the >wiki design page [1] and the repo [2] and recall having read that it has >been dropped from release 1.3. However I can't find any further >information. Hi Tino - here's the update. We decided to stop work on this version of webHob because we were lacking some key developer input and we were not convinced that we were taking the right approach. So what we have right now is a prototype of this design which was functional at least at some level (there was a demo of some functionality). The good news is that we spent the past 6 months doing research with stakeholders and we now have a proposed roadmap of features based on this research. This seems to be getting healthy enough that we think we can start a community process to refine the design and restart development. We should see an announcement to this mailing list within the next week or so to invite participation into this process. > >Cheers, >Tino > >[1] https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Web_Hob_Design >[2] http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/yocto-webhob-design/ >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto