From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add posted interrupt supporting
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:18:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CD8B4F50.20888%keir.xen@gmail.com>
References: <5165948402000078000CC240@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5165948402000078000CC240@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Yang Z Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zhang@intel.com>, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/04/2013 15:34, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:

>>>> On 10.04.13 at 15:58, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>> Are there any additional comments with this patch set? Also, what's your
>> point of using static vector?
>> If no, I will rebase the patch according to current comments.
> 
> As said before, I'd prefer use of a dynamically allocated vector
> unless you can prove that this won't perform well. Keir may
> override my vote here though...

Oh, yes, the vector should be allocated and initialised with
alloc_direct_apic_vector(). That's probably true for a number of the
existing statically-defined vectors too, but at least we should not create
any more of them!

 -- Keir

> Jan
>